GameNow WP Theme

Dark Light
Rambo [Blu-ray] Reviews

Genre: Feature Film-Action/Adventure
Rating: R
Release Date: 27-MAY-2008
Media Type: Blu-RayIf you’ve been wondering what ever happened to ex–Green Beret superwarrior John Rambo since he singlehandedly shot up a Pacific Northwest town (First Blood, 1982), returned to the jungles of ‘Nam to free U.S. POWs held long after war’s end (Rambo: First Blood Part II, 1985), and interrupted the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan long enough to blow lots of stuff up and rescue his old commandant from the Reds (Rambo III, 1988), then Rambo (2008) is for you. Without so much as a IV to dilute the brand name, Rambo–which is what most of us called the second, most iconic film in the series–may aspire to open a new era for a pop legend. But it’s a thoroughly mechanical attempt to reanimate a franchise that, absent the anger, frustration, and self-loathing of the post-Vietnam years, has no meaning or purpose. For some time now Rambo (Sylvester Stallone) has been putt-putting along the Thai-Burmese border in a longboat, catching exotic snakes to sell. As for the 60-year civil war in Burma between the brutal government and the Karen independence movement, he ignores it. Enter a party of American missionaries whose dewy blond spokeswoman (Dexter‘s Julie Benz) asks Rambo to haul them upriver so that they can bring medical aid to the insurgents. After the requisite number of monosyllabic refusals, he does. Soon afterward the do-gooders are in a world of hurt, and he’s summoned to lead a squad of mercenaries on a rescue mission.

As storytelling, the latest Rambo is the most bare-bones of the bunch. Rambo has little to say, so it’s especially galling that Stallone, as director and co-writer, obliges him to have essentially the same conversation at three different points (the final distillation: “Live for nothing or die for something”). The Burmese army goons seem in competition to commit the most hideous atrocity (e.g., child skull-crushing underfoot), the better to justify the eventual, lovingly protracted spectacle of them being eviscerated by high-powered weaponry. Although shot in Thailand, the movie has mostly been photographed in brown, reducing any particular sense of place but, perhaps, perversely increasing our gratitude for the splashes of purple whenever hot metal tatters flesh. –Richard T. Jameson

Beyond Rambo


Complete list of Rambo movies on DVD and Blu-ray

Soundtrack

Rambo: The Complete Collector’s Set

Stills from Rambo (click for larger image)

Rating: (out of 303 reviews)

List Price: $ 19.99

Price: $ 9.99

Related Blogs

  • Related Blogs on Bluray
VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
5 Comments
  • The Straw Man
    July 11, 2010
    #1
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Review by The Straw Man
    Rating:
    I must admit, that as of recent I have enjoyed current mainstream movies regardless if they are released to the theater or directly to video so I can abase them. In other words, I truly find pleasure in ripping movies apart. It has been my perception, my perception, that about 70% of movies made in the past 5 to 6 years are horrid.

    One might ask why I feel this way, well it is rather simple. Most movies are a plug in for a new phone, car or maybe to promote a soundtrack. These movies also rely more on special effects and visual stimulation, where acting, directing and story take the backseat. Therefore, movies (for the most part) in modern times are nothing more than a 90 to 100 minute commercial.

    Then of course there are the movies that are so over the top they are just down right silly. This is the perception I had when I saw the trailer for “Rambo” (it was titled “John Rambo” when I first viewed it on the internet). I thought, “What the hell is Stallone thinking”? I didn’t see the most recent “Rocky”, but I heard it wasn’t any good. I didn’t really care too much about the quality of a new “Rocky” movie, but I felt like there was nothing else to do and all doors were closed when “Rocky 5″ was made. Why was Stallone going back to Rocky? Was there a point to it? Now he is going to make another Rambo movie, why? Both these characters whose names start with “R” make a return after not being seen for almost 20 years?

    I digress to the trailer for Rambo I saw on the internet. I was laughing so hard I couldn’t take it. The way this movie was presented was comical. I had said to my brother and some friends, “I can’t wait to see this movie, I need a good laugh”. Then the day came, it was a work night (the same as a school night, but you go to work early the next day instead of school) and I went to a 9:40pm showing with my brother and two of our friends. I was so pumped and all four of us were ready to laugh very hard. As a side note, this is the first time I had been in a movie theater to watch a new release in a very long time.

    We watched and we absorbed this movie and when the end credits rolled and the lights came back on in the theater we were speechless. I thought this was the first wonderful and moving film I had seen in a long time. (So did everyone else in my view party.) I couldn’t believe it. I have seen all the other Rambo films and yes they were entertaining, but I wouldn’t say they were deep or compelling pieces of cinema. This new Rambo movie had something to say.

    It followed a different format, it seemed more dramatic and the violence (there was plenty of it) was brutal and candid. When I say candid, I mean that many of things that happened in this movie, happens in the real world.

    The plot of this film is rather simple, Rambo now lives in Southeastern Asia near Burma and some American humanitarians need a guide and ride by boat to provide health care, food and education to the poor people in the area. They find John Rambo and after some persuasions from a female team member (Julie Benz) Rambo signs on.

    Consequently, there is a large militant and fundamental group that has nothing better to do than torture and massacre the less fortunate people in their country. It doesn’t take a wizard to figure out what happens next, Rambo, guns, violence, death, and blah, blah, blah. However, the violence doesn’t seem to be moot or without justification if that makes sense. The best comparison I can make is to “Saving Private Ryan”, the violence in that film was graphic and at times over the top, but made a point to portray the reality that was World War 2. “Rambo” has the exact type of feel to it with respect to violence being graphic, over the top and making a point. Mind you I am not saying that “Rambo is a better film or as good as “Saving Private Ryan”, but it was used more as a frame of reference. Oddly enough, “Saving Private Ryan” came out in 1998 and “Rambo” came out ten years later (2008), perhaps in 2018 there will be another violent film with a message.

    Stallone did a good job too in this film he gave a rather minimal performance, not much dialogue but did display a level of dichotomy towards his emotions to events in the plot. I felt the story was also simplistic, but it worked, the movie didn’t need a multi-leveled storyline. I also felt the direction of the film was very good too; by the way Sly wrote and directed this movie.

    “Rambo” was a motion picture that stirred myriad thoughts in my head when it was over. It made me think how revolting and disgusting it is that there are still countries in the world that can’t get health care or are being “controlled” and/or restricted to certain living conditions by a dictatorship or totalitarian government that results to violence or casualties of human lives. It also made me think how insane it is that U.S. presidential candidates are able to raise thousands, if not millions, of dollars for their campaigns, but when they get into office, it then becomes difficult to “raise” money for the things they promised before they were the incumbent. Then I thought about how everyone wants to go “green” and save the environment, yet it costs more money and there is less tax breaks to “go green”. Not to mention Earth Day is only one day a year, rather than year long recognition. What about relying on fossil fuel when there are other forms of fuel for our cars/machines? Or that many people are more up to date with Reality Television than what is going on in the world.

    In conclusion, I am not sure this was Sylvester Stallone’s intention to stir the pot of modern social sciences or in my case promote schizophrenia when making this movie. However, I felt this film didn’t pull any punches and says a lot about the world we live in, on many levels. I recommend this film to anyone who wants an eye opening experience. This is a lot coming from a person who thought this movie was going to be the number one unintentional comedy of 2008 and now believes it was one of the best movies made in a very long time.

    Sly, I commend you.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wildernessman
    July 11, 2010
    #2
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Review by Wildernessman
    Rating:
    Of all the Rambo movies this one is the best. The most violent, brutal stunning movie I have ever seen. Emotionally draining story of some do gooders that want to take medicine and help to a group of poor opressed people in Burma. They are under control of the brutal military that wants no one to hear this story let alone help these people. The do gooders talk Rambo into taking them up river to the settlement. He is reluctant to take them but the woman with the group talks him into taking them. Of course they are taken by the military and most everyone in the village is slaughtered. Someone from back home comes looking for them when they never return home. Rambo takes a band of merceneries to the settlement to bring them back. The do-gooders are held captive and tortured. It’s nonstop heartpounding action after Rambo gets there.

    Iv’e never seen anything like the violence in this movie. It’s incredible.

    It’s filmed in Burma and the cinemaphotography is outstanding. Beautiful scenery. Good use of light and dark and camera angles. Very well done.

    Be prepared for the violence because it is extreme. What’s shown in this movie is going on there as I speak. We don’t hear the story in the media. Stallone made this movie with Burmese people as actors and they were all at risk making this movie. Stallone still has it at 61 years.

    If you don’t like Rambo then don’t bother. Otherwise it’s highly entertaining!

    Steve

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jason
    July 11, 2010
    #3
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Review by Jason
    Rating:
    Ignore the fact that this is a Rambo movie and some have the audacity to say that Stallone is past his prime. This Rambo movie is not only the best in the Rambo series, but it’s also one of the best action movies of all time.

    Did you think that Commando had a lot of killing? BAH!

    Did you think that Saving Private Ryan had the most gruesome injuries? Hardly.

    This movie is saturated with arms being cut off, legs exploding into bloody stumps, heads popping like over-inflated balloons, and enough gun-play to satisfy even the most hardcore, extremist gun-enthusiast. If it isn’t an arrow evenly dividing a man’s skull, or someone’s intestines being spilled on the ground, then it’s an extreme amount of people being sawed in half by high calibre machine gun fire. There’s even a crazy-intense seen in which Rambo basically pulls off the throat removal move from Roadhouse, only with a little slower satisfaction to it. About the only thing lacking is a Colombian necktie.

    The story itself plays second-fiddle to the incredible amount of action. A church-group from Colorado is doing peacework in Burma, bringing medicine and religion to people oppressed by a militaristic regime intent on genocide. To make their way into hostile territory, the church-goers ask for Rambo’s services as a river guide. At first he is hesitant, but the kind-hearted but deadly Rambo eventually consents.

    Sure enough, after Rambo drops them off for their jungle-trek to the villagers, the church-group gets caught in the middle of chaos, as the evil military members are senselessly slaughtering every villager in sight. Once they are captured, it’s up to Rambo to save the day.

    The rest of the movie is a whirlwind of action, as Rambo leads in a hardened group of mercenaries for an extraction mission. They plan on sneaking into the compound, killing anything and anyone that gets in their way, and saving the prisoners. What transpires is carnage the likes of which I have never seen before.

    This version of Rambo is an incredible movie if you’re looking for pure action and entertainment from beginning to end. I haven’t been more entertained by a movie in a very long time.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • A man from the east coast
    July 11, 2010
    #4
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Review by A man from the east coast
    Rating:
    It is nothing short of astounding to me how many people (exception: ) seem to just not get this movie. To me, this is a very fine war picture.

    In a misguided attempt to be witty, there are those who are saying that the film’s body count should be compared to the number of words spoken onscreen, to see which is higher.

    One must realize that David Morrell, the original author of “First Blood”, and Stallone, who co-authored the original film’s screenplay, and is a co-author of the “Rambo” screenplay, both envision and present John Rambo as a man who is profoundly introverted. Stallone has, at least partially, based his writing and protrayal of this character on his son Seargeoh, who is profoundly autistic. Stallone has stayed true to this portrayal, critics be damned. John Rambo shows little of his emotional and psychological identity to the outside world, and only slightly more to those few whom he considers to be his friends. Col. Trautman saw a side to “Johnny” that few others do. Sarah, a Christian Missionary in this latest installment, is only one of a few characters in the series to be distinguished as being someone John Rambo considers to be his friend.

    Also present here is implication is that this is just a bloodfest for sick voyeurs who like to watch people suffering and dying.

    Nothing could be further from the truth. Although this is, indeed, a profoundly violent film, that barely escaped an NC-17 rating, one thing must be made clear: THIS FILM DOES NOT GLORIFY VIOLENCE.

    A Vietnam veteran once said to me, “The only thing that will prepare you for battle is to be in one. There is nothing that can truly prepare you for what war is really like. Nothing.” Having written that, I cannot now tell you that seeing films like “Saving Private Ryan” with it’s ultra-high body count will put you on a level of first-hand knowledge comparable to a combat veteran. No one has ever suggested such a thing, not should they. However, many veterans of the D-Day invasion had to leave the theatre during the scenes of storming the beach at Normandy. This tells me that Spielberg got it right, and his film will stand for decades as the best possible cinematic telling of what that day was like.

    Stallone is doing something similar here. This film presents war at its most horrific. This film is quite dissimilar to “Saving Private Ryan” in that the storyline in “SPR” was an archplot. In other words, an epic, something Joseph Campbell of THE MONOMYTH fame would identify as a story that transcends cultures, identities and contexts. The mission that leads to the finding of Private Ryan reveals much about the nature of war and those that fight it, and in so doing much about the human condition is brought to light. Specifically, humanity fighting tooth-and-nail for survival against a culture that has been corrupted to the point of profound evil.

    This installment of Rambo is distinct from this monomyth, archplot structure. This is by no means an epic. Stallone shows us one of his most famous characters, living by himself in Thailand, making a living selling snakes and piloting a boat on the Salween river. He is approached by a group of Christian missionaries intent on bringing medical and other humanitarian supplies to the Karen people of Myanmar (referred to as Burma in the film). Rambo initially refuses, making no emotional connection with Michael, a Christian doctor imploring Rambo to assist him in his cause. The missionaries’ sole female, Sarah, then attempts to convince Rambo to help. It is obvious that an immediate emotional connection is made.

    What is interesting here is that the missionaries are scripted by Stallone to sound exactly as they do in real life: profoundly idealistic, convinced that they alone understand how to change the world better than anybody else ever could, and absolutely unwilling to listen to reason (these aren’t presented as negative traits per se, but rather as their mentality, for better or for worse). Stallone’s Rambo is usually a man of few words, but he uses his economy of dialog to make his points quite clear. He has no interest in debate. He asks Michael, who has declared that he means to change things in Burma, if he’s planning on bringing any weapons.

    “Of course not,” Michael responds, clearly contemptuous, not of Rambo, but of the idea of taking weapons to try to stop Burma’s endless violence.

    “Then you ain’t changin’ nothin’”, is Rambo’s response, spoken in an overtone of absolute finality, and with an undertone of the despair John Rambo’s experience has bequealthed upon him, that further debate is clearly pointless. (In case you missed it, Stallone-hating reviewers, Sly is doing something called “acting”. You wouldn’t understand.)

    A few scenes later, Sarah manages to convince Rambo to help the missionaries. Although payment is offered, Rambo refuses it. Rambo and the missionaries begin their journey up the Salween river. When Sarah begins to speak with Rambo during the boat ride, she asks his name, to which he replies, “John”.

    Are you getting me, dear reader? It isn’t, “I’M RAMBO, THE MOST POWERFUL WARRIOR OF ALL TIME, HELPING YOU PUNY WEAKLING DO-GOODERS TO SAVE THE WORLD FROM …” and yada-yada-yada. It’s clear from Rambo’s demeanor that he is not terribly impressed with himself. A first name introduction suffices just fine, as far as he’s concerned. His violent resume? He’d just as soon not speak of it at all, answering Sarah’s questions about his past with the shortest answers possible. “John”, as he introduces himself, is profoundly divested of pride. Sarah’s a committed Christian missionary, long in the habit of putting her money where her mouth is, and living selflessly according to her belief in aiding the oppressed in any way she can. John’s lack of pride, in inextricable tandem with his very powerful presense, well be at least part what draws her to her friendship with him.

    You’ll recall, dear reader, if you watched “Rambo III”, that Rambo refuses to join Col. Trautman in his mission to Afghanistan with the words, “My war is over.” As Stallone has taken over the writing of this story from it’s initial novelist creator, David Morrell, Rambo’s inner conflict has become that he is supremely gifted in the art of waging war, but wants nothing more than to cease fighting and killing.

    This is highlighted in this new installment of “Rambo” during a dream sequence in which Rambo is hearing the voice of Col. Trautman, these words from the final scenes of “First Blood” and also “Rambo III” haunting

    John Rambo as he sleeps. Trautman accuses Rambo of tearing away at himself, resisting what he is. Rambo is, in Trautman’s view, a one-of-a-kind warrior, capable of victory against overwhelming odds. This is John Rambo’s gift.

    John Rambo is then awakened from this dream by another missionary, who comes to tell him that Sarah, Michael and the other missionaries are missing. We in the audience already know this, as we’ve just witnessed the horrific assault on the village the missionaries had reached and were working to help.

    This sequence is brilliantly shot by director Stallone, presenting a maelstorm of violence and atrocity that explodes on screen, each image presented telling a story in itself. This attack occurs during a moment of profound tenderness. Stallone shows us humanities’ saving grace in his depictions of the doctor’s ministering to the villagers both medically and spiritually. This culminates with Sarah moving towards a child, embracing him and comforting him. We see that this is the most natural expression of her identity. This is who she is. This child is someone she has never met before, is not related to, and is someone to whom most people would say she owes nothing. But there she is, putting herself in extreme danger of unimaginable torture and certain death simply because of her beliefs. You’ll have to see this moment to truly understand it, but rest assured, you will see both the best and the worst of what it is to be human in these scenes that are onscreen for only a few moments. The attack quickly overwhelms the village. Sarah and her friends are taken prisoner.

    From here, the pace of the film picks up quite a bit. John Rambo prepares himself for battle, forging a new blade at his anvil, his internal dialog a monologue of coming to terms with what he is, and what he is meant to do.

    For now, John Rambo is not fighting a war his commanders sent him to fight, nor is he fighting the country that didn’t want him back. He is not fighting to free POW’s from that war, in an effort to right the wrongs of America’s involvement in Vietnam. He’s not fighting to free his mentor and teacher Col. Trautman, as doing so is his duty, dictated by the inescapable bonds of the warrior brotherhood. He is, possibly for the first time in his life, committing to an act of war based upon his own beliefs, period. It is clear an emotional bond was formed with Sarah. John Rambo cannot leave her to the atrocities of her captors.

    Don’t try to attack that one either, Stallone-bashers; No, the scenes in which John Rambo and Sarah become friends were not too brief. Some people are true friends in a few moments, others would not become true friends if forced to spend a lifetime together. The depth of the emotional connection between John and Sarah is quite clear to me. If it isn’t to you, that says more about you than it does about this film. Deal with it.

    The film continues, with John Rambo guiding a group of mercenaries up the Salween River, staying out of their soldier’s banter, and refusing to take the bait of the strongest of the mercenaries, who tries to intimidate John. We see from Stallone’s enactment of his character that John Rambo is not at all intimidated, but will not engage in a fight with this man. John’s abilities are quite intact, but his lack of pride in what he is persuades him that it’s not worth showing this mercerary what he can do. The time for that, as we soon see, comes later.

    To see what happens from here, go see the film. It’s is a story about a man who makes a decision about who and what he is. He comes to realize that he is a warrior. He cannot escape this identity. He admits to himself that he has killed in the past, not for a cause but for the enjoyment of using this gift of waging war. Yet now, he commits himself to a fight for his own reason: his bond with Sarah. This film is about choosing to fight, not to defend one’s pride against the taunts of a mercenary, or for a political cause, or for a warrior brotherhood, but for something that exists deep within oneself. At this point in John Rambo’s life, this is all the really matters. It is about fighting to defend and protect that which we hold dear. It is about what Sarah was trying to communicate to John in the beginning of the film; it is about laying down your life for your friends, for those you care for.

    There is no great and complex plot in this film, no series of plot-twisting rising actions, each event in the storyline there to compel deep thought about our history as a nation, and about human history. No, this film drops us in to a particular point in John Rambo’s life in which we witness him make a decision about his identity, and then act upon that decision in such a way that once committed, he can be true to his identity and very likely lose his life, or, he can deny who he is, and what he truly believes in, and so live a life that matters nothing to anyone, least of all to himself.

    This is a film about John Rambo choosing, for the first time, to fight for what he himself believes in. It is a film that forces the audience to see war for the nightmare that it is, not a spectacle to entertain the masses by appealing to the lowest common denominator. This is a film about one man who makes a choice about what his gift is for, and in so doing is finally, at the end of his saga, true to what he really is: One who is supremely gifted at sheperding the weak through the valley of the shadow of death.

    I recommend this film without reservation. This is one of the best war films ever made.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Puzzle box
    July 11, 2010
    #5
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Review by Puzzle box
    Rating:
    It’s great to see that Stallone still makes some great films, the new Rambo film was fantastic and its probably one of the best films I’ve seen this year. Sylvester Stallone looks fit despite his old age and he looks like he can still pull it off and all the action scenes were great, Stallone has brought back the character that made him famous during the 80′s and established his career as an action star. John Rambo has retired to Thailand where he finds and captures snakes for a living, he is approached by a group of christian missionaries who ask for his help in guiding them upriver into Burma so they can provide medical assistance to victims of the Burmese genocide. At first John is not convinced but he soon changes his mind, when they arrive it is soon to late and they get attacked and captured by an evil Burmese army. Its up to Rambo to lead a group of merceneries to rescue them, some of the characters were a bit one dimensional especially the merceneries and the dialogue was cheesy as hell but still entertaining and I wasn’t really looking for any dramatic acting I just wanted to watch an enjoyable action flick and thats what I found with Rambo it was definitely similar to the previous films done in the 80′s only with some modern directing. Story-wise I think that the film’s plot was simple and was basically about John Rambo killing the bad guys and saving the day but it also highlights real life conflict since the Burmese people are still fighting for their independence from their own military government, John Rambo’s character however has always been great its like a powerful mix of cynicism and honor and he doesn’t like to be messed with as you’ll see in this film. There are some people who wouldn’t like this since the level of violence was really high with people being blown up, limbs being hacked off, decapitations ect. and there were quite a few bloody war scenes but if your the type of person who doesn’t mind some gore and violence then you might enjoy this, theres really a lot to enjoy in terms of action in this film it was really exciting even thought it was over the top.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Leave a Reply:




Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes