GameNow WP Theme

Dark Light
The Ballad of Cable Hogue
  • ISBN13: 9780790793092
  • Condition: NEW
  • Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.

Sam Peckinpah’s light-hearted, rambunctious ode to the dying Wild West, with Jason Robards as a rascally prospector who transforms a desert water-hole into big business. Year: 1970 Director: Sam Peckinpah Starring: Jason Robards, Stella Stevens, David Warner What does it tell us that Sam Peckinpah’s most joyous and life-affirming movie is also his most underappreciated? The Ballad of Cable Hogue was made in that singular moment when, having just completed The Wild Bunch, Peckinpah knew he was back in the game as a feature-film director; and before anyone (including Peckinpah himself?) had an inkling of how completely he was about to redefine the Western genre, contemporary American filmmaking, and his own personal legend.

Cable Hogue is a splendiferous entertainment: a grufty Western tall tale, a lusty comedy, and also (in critic Kathleen Murphy’s phrase) “a musical about the economic and emotional complexities of capitalism.” Its title character–Jason Robards in a great, exuberant gift of a performance–is an ornery varmint left by two scurrilous partners (L.Q. Jones and Strother Martin) to die in the desert. Through pure cussedness and what may be dumb luck, may be divine intervention, he “finds water where it wasn’t” and survives. Nothing to do now but settle back, let his waterhole–the only one on the stage line between Deaddog and Gila–make him a rich man, and await the day those two old partners drop by his waystation.

Besides such Peckinpah regulars as Slim Pickens, R.G. Armstrong, and Gene Evans, the movie features Stella Stevens in her career-best role as Hildy, Hogue’s best reason for getting into town now and again, and David Warner, an itinerant preacher and full-time lech who becomes his soulmate. Lucien Ballard photographed, and there’s a charming song score (by Richard Gillis) whose neglect is as mystifying as that of the film. Above all, there is Sam Peckinpah exulting in the lyrical, heart-filling possibilities of making a motion picture, trying just about anything, and finding it beautiful. This film was his personal favorite. –Richard T. JamesonHere’s how director Sam Peckinpah described his motivation behind The Wild Bunch at the time of the film’s 1969 release: “I was trying to tell a simple story about bad men in changing times. The Wild Bunch is simply what happens when killers go to Mexico. The strange thing is you feel a great sense of loss when these killers reach the end of the line.” All of these statements are true, but they don’t begin to cover the impact that Peckinpah’s film had on the evolution of American movies. Now the film is most widely recognized as a milestone event in the escalation of screen violence, but that’s a label of limited perspective. Of course, Peckinpah’s bloody climactic gunfight became a masterfully directed, photographed, and edited ballet of graphic violence that transcended the conventional Western and moved into a slow-motion realm of pure cinematic intensity. But the film–surely one of the greatest Westerns ever made–is also a richly thematic tale of, as Peckinpah said, “bad men in changing times.” The Wild Bunch is a masterpiece that should not be defined strictly in terms of its violence, but as a story of mythic proportion, brimming with rich characters and dialogue and the bittersweet irony of outlaw traditions on the wane. –Jeff Shannon

Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid may be the most beautiful and ambitious film that Sam Peckinpah ever made. The time is 1881. Powerful interests want New Mexico tamed for their brand of progress, and Sheriff Pat Garrett (James Coburn) is commissioned to rid the territory of his old gunfighting comrades. He serves fair notice to William Bonney–Billy the Kid (Kris Kristofferson)–and his Fort Sumter cronies, but it’s not in their nature, or his, to go quietly. Peckinpah’s theme, more than ever, is the closing of the frontier and the nature of the loss that that entails. But this time his vision takes him beyond genre convention, beyond history and legend, to the bleeding heart of myth–and surely of himself. This is one strange and original movie. In 1973 most American reviewers responded by panning it and deriding its director, whom they saw as having betrayed the promise of Ride the High Country, been swept up in his own cult of violence, and become incoherent as a storyteller. Coherence wasn’t helped by MGM’s cutting at least a quarter-of-an-hour out of the finished film and removing a bitter, retrospective prelude. Subsequent releases have restored a lot of material, and now there’s more widespread appreciation of the depth and power of Peckinpah’s achievement. The cast, teeming with fine character actors, is extraordinary, making the gallery of frontier denizens vivid and resonant. –Richard T. Jameson

What does it tell us that Sam Peckinpah’s most joyous and life-affirming movie is also his most underappreciated? The Ballad of Cable Hogue was made in that singular moment when, having just completed The Wild Bunch, Peckinpah knew he was back in the game as a feature-film director; and before anyone (including Peckinpah himself?) had an inkling of how completely he was about to redefine the Western genre, contemporary American filmmaking, and his own personal legend. Cable Hogue is a splendiferous entertainment: a grufty Western tall tale, a lusty comedy, and also (in critic Kathleen Murphy’s phrase) “a musical about the economic and emotional complexities of capitalism.” Its title character–Jason Robards in a great, exuberant gift of a performance–is an ornery varmint left by two scurrilous partners (L.Q. Jones and Strother Martin) to die in the desert. Besides such Peckinpah regulars as Slim Pickens, R.G. Armstrong, and Gene Evans, the movie features Stella Stevens in her career-best role as Hildy, Hogue’s best reason for getting into town now and again, and David Warner, an itinerant preacher and full-time lech who becomes his soulmate. Lucien Ballard photographed, and there’s a charming song score (by Richard Gillis) whose neglect is as mystifying as that of the film. Above all, there is Sam Peckinpah exulting in the lyrical, heart-filling possibilities of making a motion picture, trying just about anything, and finding it beautiful. This film was his personal favorite. –Richard T. Jameson

Ride the High Country is the one Sam Peckinpah movie about which there has never been controversy–save at MGM in 1962, when a new studio regime opted to dump this beautiful, heartbreakingly elegiac Western into the bottom half of a double-bill. Westerns rarely even got reviewed back then, so it’s wellnigh miraculous that critics discovered the movie and raved about it. Newsweek called it the best American picture of the year. Veteran cowboy stars Randolph Scott and Joel McCrea portray aging gunslingers in the twilight of the Old West. The slow-building tension between longtime friends–one still true to the code he’s lived by, the other having drifted away from it–anticipates the tortuous personal dilemmas played out to the death by Peckinpah’s Wild Bunch, Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid, and Benny and Elita in Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia. The action scenes are powerful, if only beginning to suggest the radical technique with which Peckinpah would astonish audiences in just a few years. But his feeling for flavorsome dialogue, Rabelaisian humor, and full-blooded character acting is already unmistakable. McCrea and Scott are simply superb. The two proposed that they swap roles before filming got underway, and the question of who got first billing was settled by flipping a coin. Both men retired once the film was in the can. They knew they’d never top it. –Richard T. Jameson

Buy “The Ballad of Cable Hogue” For Only $5.45

Related Blogs

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
5 Comments
  • The Concise Critic:
    April 19, 2010
    #1
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    There are films that are not just movies to me–”The Sound of Music,” “The Last Tycoon,” “Chariots of Fire,” “The Purple Rose of Cairo”. . . Yet, I won’t watch them again; I’m certain, for some reason, they would be disappointing on review.

    Had I seen “The Ballad of Cable Hogue” in 1970 I would have loved it. There is great stuff here: a smiling $5.00 bill, a beautiful heroine with pretty underwear, a eulogy for, what?–individualism, a frontier way of life, and. . .

    But the corn shows, too. The film has, perhaps as all films must, not aged well.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • B. A. Fred
    April 19, 2010
    #2
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    “The Wild Bunch” and “Ride the High Country” are suberb westerns. “The Ballad of Cable Hogue” is quirky, but good. “Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid” was a big disappointment. James Couburn is good as Garrett, but there isn’t much of a plot and Kris Kristofferson is terrible as Billy.

    All in all I thought the collection a good buy, and I will watch “The Wild Bunch” many times as it is a cut above most of the rest of the westerns.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Peter Hoogenboom
    April 19, 2010
    #3
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Confounding expectation, Peckinpah’s follow up to “The Wild Bunch” is a broad comedy. The humour is on a pretty juvenile level though and a scene in the middle where a drunken priest (David Warner) consoles a grieving woman is particularly idiotic and demeaning to women (one could write a whole thesis about Peckinpah’s misogyny and generally warped attitude to women). Despite this, Peckinpah does recreate the atmosphere of an old Western town and extends the boundaries of the Western genre.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • S. C. Dixon Photography
    April 19, 2010
    #4
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I’ve always been a big fan of Sam Peckinpah and a bigger fan of Strother Martin so when I ran across this film some years ago on late night television I was hooked. Recently I bought a copy of the DVD and watched it again and I think it is better than I remembered it being, which is always a nice surprise.

    Peckinpah’s noted fixation on extreme violence isn’t really present here, to any notable degree; in fact this film is rather sweet, or at least bitter-sweet. There is the obligatory killing or two but they’re rather incidental.

    Robard’s performance is excellent as to be expected, but then so is everyone else’s. One thing about Sam was that he had an eye for characters.

    Unfortunately he didn’t have much of an ear for music. I’ve long noted that in nearly all of his films the soundtracks are awful and this one is no exception. The tunes are intended to be mellow and invocative but in reality are maudlin and syrupy. In the end they don’t do much damage and I’m sure that there are folks out there who feel quite differently about the music than I do.

    Still it is an interesting film and it does have “staying power”. In the final analysis it may be one of Peckinpah’s finer efforts.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • PolarisDiB
    April 19, 2010
    #5
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Sam Peckinpah is known for his westerns, and here’s another one. However (this being the second western of his I’ve seen), I get the distinct feeling from him that he had a little more on his mind than genre. I found Wild Bunch to be a heavily post-modern approach to the western story, making completely brutal characters out of archetypal heroes and turning typical gunfights into gritty massacres (like the end. Everyone romanticizes it, but it’s really just four really crazy but reserved men going into a town and shooting everyone, evil and innocent alike, with a huge machine gun until they’re finally put to their own deaths. Nothing heroic in it).

    This movie is more modernist, I’d say, with a bizarre sort of humor. There’s a nymphomaniacal priest, a bunch of characters that basically don’t take each other seriously, and then there’s our protagonist, who is “not a good man, and not a bad man, but a man.” Really that’s all he is. You don’t sympathize with him, but then again you don’t hate him. He’s just sort of there, in a recognizable and profound way.

    Peckinpah himself shows his visual cunning in this film, with acute transitions that really place a bizarre timeline to the film and, interestingly enough, a great sense of zoom. Zoom, of all things. I mean… zoom! Who really makes an entire movie an artform out of just that? Well, Sam does, I guess.

    Both westerns of his I’ve seen were about the end of the western era, and thus I think he himself is trying to end the genre itself by completely changing the contexts of the heroes we regarded in such films. Cable Hogue is a great rag-to-riches story… but in the end who cares? He’s neither completely a man of the desert or a hero of the West. He is confused by the approach of technology, but basically embraces it, and doesn’t begrudge it its ending of his life and style. This is VERY opposed to what I see most filmmakers do with the form, classically and contemperarily. From the spaghetti westerns that idealized our great hero dominators of the frontier to the Kevin Costner laments of pain of the Native Americans who ended up losing their land, The Wild West is still, at heart, a romantic and amazing place like that out of a fairytale, Disney or Grimm. peckinpah’s West is a blank one, a dry one… and a humanist one.

    3.5 stars.

    –PolarisDiB

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Leave a Reply:




Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes