GameNow WP Theme

Dark Light
Midnight Cowboy

Daring. Provocative. Shocking. Compelling. Nearly thirty years after its original release, “Midnight Cowboy is still heartbreakingand timeless” (The New York Observer). This Academy AwardĂ‚(r) winner* for Best Picture, Director and Screenplay also boasts OscarĂ‚(r)-nominated** performances by Dustin Hoffman and Jon Voight, neither of whom have “ever been better on screen than they are here” (Chicago Tribune)! When Joe Buck (Voight), a good-looking,naively charming Texas “cowboy” makes his way to the Big Apple to seek his fortune, the only wealthhe finds is in the friendship of Ratso Rizzo (Hoffman), a scrounging, sleazy, small-time con man with big dreams. Living on the tattered fringe of society, these two outcasts develop an unlikely bond one that transcends their broken dreams and get-rich-quick schemes and makes Midnight Cowboy “that rarest of things: [a film] every bit as moving now as it was when it was [first] released” (Premiere). *1969 **1969: ActorThe first, and only, X-rated film to win a best picture Academy Award, John Schlesinger’s Midnight Cowboy seems a lot less daring today (and has been reclassified as an R), but remains a fascinating time capsule of late-1960s sexual decadence in mainstream American cinema. In a career-making performance, Jon Voight plays Joe Buck, a naive Texas dishwasher who goes to the big city (New York) to make his fortune as a sexual hustler. Although enthusiastic about selling himself to rich ladies for stud services, he quickly finds it hard to make a living and eventually crashes in a seedy dump with a crippled petty thief named Ratzo Rizzo (Dustin Hoffman, doing one of his more effective “stupid acting tricks,” with a limp and a high-pitch rasp of a voice). Schlesinger’s quick-cut, semi-psychedelic style has dated severely, as has his ruthlessly cynical approach to almost everybody but the lead characters. But at its heart the movie is a sad tale of friendship between a couple of losers lost in the big city, and with an ending no studio would approve today. It’s a bit like an urban Of Mice and Men, but where both guys are Lenny. –Jim Emerson

Buy “Midnight Cowboy” For Only $8.55

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
5 Comments
  • Albert Lee
    March 29, 2008
    #1
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    This film is interesting only as a reflection of the degradation

    and evil of the hollywood liberals at the peak of their powers.

    This cesspool was given an academy award in 1969 and its a

    distillation of all the ideas in the liberal’s campaign to

    destroy America.

    The message of this film to those who saw it was: be a bum,

    take drugs, engage in anonmyous unsafe sex and

    above all don’t work. And that its the obligation of the

    rest of society to assist you in pursuit of your lifestyle with

    cash payments, free housing and free medical care.

    The heros of the film are two deadbeats who parasite off the

    rest of society. The first one starts out as an ordinary

    American from the heartland who inexplicably quits his job

    and decides to become a prostitute in New York. The other

    one is a human rat whose moral decay has become physical, lives

    off garbage and lives in the spaces where normal people will

    not go.

    In his assault on American values, the director takes the

    familiar image of the cowboy in american life and pushes

    the transformational propoganda idea in the film that rather

    than being a strong male image, its a fetish image for lowlifes.

    The cowboy in the film hangs out like a bum, runs out of money

    and then moves in with the kindly human rat. The idea of going

    back to work never enters his mind as his money is running out

    nor does leaving the city. The film also does an excellent

    job in creating a propoganda world-view that the “bad people”

    are the new yorkers working and doing things rather than these

    bums.

    They set up housekeeping together in abandoned building and

    drift into a life of petty crime together. The human rat

    encourages the other guy to believe his delusions about being

    a male prostitute. The human rat dreams that the solution to

    all his problems will be in Florida.

    The centerpiece of the film is a 1960′s style drug party where

    inexpicably these two bums are invited. As would be expected,

    the drugged out liberal hippies end up being the path to success

    for the bums. The hippie women are apparently more than willing

    to pay for sex with street bums. That makes more sense than

    it might seem because their hippie men are probably so messed

    up from their drugs as not to be an option.

    But then it all goes wrong. The human rat reaches the end of

    the line. Its as if the very possiblity of success triggers

    off a new round of moral and physical decay. To save him,

    we get more petty crime which leads to a bus trip to florida.

    They get him to Florida, but its too late.

    This is an all-out message film and the message is that work

    is wrong, being a bum is noble, your problems are not your

    own fault ever, drugs are the solution to everything,

    that the life of a street prostitute is an exciting adventure

    full of colorful characters and that its all those ordinary

    working people in the city that look you funny who are hateful

    and messed up. And that (finally) being a bum isn’t a problem,

    its living in New York thats the problem. Florida sunshine

    will make everything better.

    This film inaguarated the golden age of street trash, porn,

    hookers and drugs in American Culture which lasted almost

    ten years. Ten years of heroic pimps, hip druggies and

    glamorizing the lives of streetwalkers while the downtowns

    of american cities took the New York of this film as their

    model for urban development (porn districts and open-air drug

    markets).

    Nobody will ever know how many lives this idiotic glamorization

    of the gutter cost. But in the end, the intent of these people

    was so evil that the world they were trying to create destroyed

    itself before it could destroy all america.

    The happy street-people of the 1970′s leading their happy street

    life got older and less appealing. And when Ronald Reagan was

    elected, they were transformed from happy street people into

    the suffering homeless. The liberals took the human wreckage

    that their ideology of street life and drugs had created and

    then demanded that the government solve the problem by giving

    out money. But by that time, drugs and disease had already

    claimed most of the liberals who bought into this film’s vision.

    And those that remained were too few and too discredited to

    convince anyone of anything.

    Its interesting only as an example of the depths of liberal

    propoganda and what the message of the liberals to the country

    was. They started in the 1950s with anti-america films, then

    moved on to anti-god and anti-marriage films, then drug films

    and then reached the end of the line with Midnight Cowboy

    where the very notion of working itself is dismissed as

    irrelivant. It was a careful plan designed to lead americans

    down a road of degenerative thought. It was successful for

    a while, but in the end it was defeated.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    March 29, 2008
    #2
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Vastly overrated gunk fails to stand the test of time due to pretentious “look at me, Ma, no hands” direction. The party sequence is so embarrassing it’s almost hard to watch. Will today’s music-video style films looks as visually silly and dated 30 years from now? If Midnight Cowboy is any indication, the answer is YES! Yeah, yeah, great performances, sure, but they do not support the lackluster script and bohemian direction.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • inframan
    March 29, 2008
    #3
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    This contrived piece of sentimental quasi-gay Hollywood indulgence must really have titillated them back 35 or so years ago, same people who thought Hair was a racy musical. Jon Voight does a fine Elvis impression but Dustin sounds like he’s doing a puppet act from an old radio show. I lived in NYC on & off for years going to school on the UPWS in the 50s & never ever saw anyone who talked or walked like Hoffman does in this, except maybe outside Actors Studio on 45th street.

    Great if too quick shots of Hubert’s Museum & Flea Circus & other 42nd street nostalgia, though, makes it worth a couple stars anyway.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Aaron D. Mitchell
    March 29, 2008
    #4
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    You can almost bet on one of two things about movies with alot of controversy, it will be a bad movie that everyone will end up seeing or a great movie that nobody sees. This is the first one. I have heard for years “it’s the only X rated movie to win best picture!” Despite some of the other reviews I’ve read I did not think this movie was good. I didn’t care about the movie being X (although later changed to R) I just wanted to see a good movie, especially after hearing about it all this time. I was very disapointed. It was long and boring. I love all types of film, so I’m not being judgemental about it being a drama. The acting perfomances really are great, but that is about it. I did not like the directing style. Some of the other reviews say, “It hasn’t dated at all”. That’s so far from the truth, don’t be fooled by that. The movie is VERY dated looking. I’m 26 years old so I just might not get it but I don’t see anything “modern” about this movie. Like I said good acting, even though Dustin Hoffman does almost the same shtick years later in Rain Man. When I got done I was glad it was finaly over. 20 minutes into the movie I was starting to get that “come on lets get this over with feeling”. Plus they play that horrible “Everybody’s Talking” song about 900 times through the course of the movie. Yeah that never gets old. The movie is basicly, Jon Voight wants to be a “hustler” to take money from rich women for sex, but he gets hustled. He then repeatedly gets taken advantage of by EVERYBODY. He befriends a really sleazy Dustin Hoffman and the homosexual overtones run rampent for these two. I don’t know if the were supposed to come across gay at the time, but it sure comes across that way now. If that wasn’t what the director was going for then he made the wrong movie. It’s just amazing to me that this movie won best picture. I could not see any reason it should have won best picture. But I also can’t see any reason Gladiator won best picture as well. In closing, don’t believe the hype, the movie is not even close to as good as some claim it to be.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • David Smith
    March 29, 2008
    #5
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    what can i say… “midnight cowboy” is just very, very overrated. jon voight plays an interesting, though completely unbelievable cowboy gigolo. the absurdity of this character might be okay, if the movie did not try to convince you at every moment of his traumatic past and try to make you feel sorry for him. nonetheless, voight does a good acting job at least. dustin hoffman plays a new york pimp, another unbelievable character. sure, you move to new york and try to make instant friends with someone and have them live rent-free in their apartment. good luck with that. though they have nothing in common, the two characters become fast best friends for no reason (and you’ll surely wonder whether there is any gay attraction going on). while the movie does feature some interesting “innovative” cut-scenes, with such a weak story, it’s no good. as dustin hoffman hobbles around his apartment coughing and the cowboy takes care of him, i was supposed to feel sorry for him, but it was all kind of funny because it was so fake. i made it pretty close to the end but returned it. what happened at the end? i don’t care. it’s an unrealistic silly story. voight and hoffman try to make it good with their acting talent, but there’s only so far they can go with this script. like so many things, it’s overrated by the vast majority of people and critics.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Leave a Reply:




Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes