- How far would you go to get the person of your dreams? In EATING OUT, Kyle (Jim Verraros) convinced his straight roommate to pretend to be gay to get the girl. Now, with the help of Gwen (Emily Brooke Hands) and Tiffani (Rebekah Kochan), Kyle pretends to be heterosexual to land Troy (Marco Dapper), the new guy — and nude model — in town, only to find himself joining the campus ex-gay support gro
How far would you go to get the person of your dreams? In the first Eating Out, Kyle (Jim Verraros) convinced his straight roommate to pretend to be gay in order to get the girl. Now, with the help of Gwen (Emily Brooke Hands) and Tiffani (Rebekah Kochan), Kyle pretends to be heterosexual in order to land Troy (Marco Dapper), the new guy (and nude model) who’s turning the heads of both men and women. He soon finds himself joining the campus ex-gay support group and nabbing a girlfriend (Tiffany)! Kyle’s ex-boyfriend Marc (Brett Chukerman) is horrified at the plan and decides to pursue the confused Troy with his own tactic — being his “out” gay self. Who will win Troy first? In the boy eat boy, boy eat girl, bisexual mystique of Eating Out 2, the stakes are raised, sexual boundaries are obliterated, and the answer is never what you might expect!
Buy “Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds” For Only $11.73
March 20, 2008
#1
The title says it all really – sloppy and grotty. I have waited for this for so long. I loved Eating Out and was hoping for much more (and better) of the same. No no no – this says it is the first gay sequel. You should have saved the trouble – but I think the Donald Strachey movies (Third Man out and Shock to the System) would qualify as the first wouldn’t they? Well they are definitely the first GOOD series. I thought nude model and new guy Troy (Marco Dapper) was much better looking than the NOT original movie Marc (Brett Chukerman) who was supposed to be the hotty – he was notty the hotty. This is a farce, and not the genre I like – was it supposed to be? Don’t care, it’s BAD. Where is the romantic ribbons of story in the first? It seems cobbled together and a BIG waste of time. On a positive note Tiffini (Rebekah Kochan) is becoming better on screen – she was too campy over-acty in the last movie. In this one she is slimmer (not that she was fat before, she was certainly voluptuous:0) ). She is looking stunning in this one. On the other hand I didn’t take to Emily Brooke Hands in this one, Gwen was just regurgitated…no growth, stale. The story is poor, the premise is ridiculous, and I missed the original Marc. I can’t believe how disappointing this sequel is. I suggest you give it a miss. Rent it – if you are so BORED that counting the tiles on your ceiling has become routine and you don’t have the inclination to go to the worst movie showing which would be a step up from this. Q. Allan Brocka did MUCH better with Boy Culture, now THAT I recommend.Boy CultureShock to the System: A Donald Strachey MysteryThird Man Out
March 20, 2008
#2
I enjoyed the first film. It wasn’t great, but it was okay. Okay enough to own. The only good thing about this sequel is that it makes the first one look so much better. All the characters are way too cartoonish and overplayed to be taken seriously. The story structure is the same as the first with the ‘seduction scenes’ framed by the story scenes. Trouble is, there’s no story here. Character flaws aplenty (Kyle was a music student in the first and now he’s an art student, along with Gwen and Tiffany. When did all that happen?) Lots of hot boy flesh to enjoy and a couple frontal nude moments are about the only pluses to be found in this trainwreck. The writers probably would have been better off centering on new characters and try a fresh story instead of trying to recycle the first one and then sloppily tacking on a message with the anti-gay group, which played out like a ploy that seemed more at home in a ‘Police Academy’. The first movie worked out into a sweet gay love story but this one just flopped around like a fish fresh out of the water, and just like that fish, this one stinks!
March 20, 2008
#3
The whole shooting and presentations of both two releases just focused on Bodies, Faces and Sex a bit much. The movies are more candy for the eyes rather than storyline attractions!
Neverthless, still worth to watch it while you are eating!
March 20, 2008
#4
I enjoyed the original movie so much that I have watched it again and again, and have recommended it to friends, who also loved it. I could barely make it through this sequal the first time!
March 20, 2008
#5
I bought this film on the strength of the first film, Eating Out. It was an enjoyable movie, but the lines that brought such laughter from Gwen (Emily Brooke Hands) and some of the other cast were absent from this film. The first film was set in Tucson, AZ, but this film appears to be studio based. It is an OK movie, but if you’re expecting the laughter that was based on the lines in the first film, you’ll be disappointed in this one.