GameNow WP Theme

Dark Light
The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill
  • ISBN13: 9780767085977
  • Condition: NEW
  • Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.

An “engrossing, delightful film” (The Washington Post), THE WILD PARROTS OF TELEGRAPH HILL is the bonafide sleeper theatrical hit of the year. The film’s endearing guide is Mark Bittner, an aging bohemian, but the supporting cast members, a rambunctious flock of urban parrots, are the true stars, and their surprisingly humanlike behavior makes for a wondrous and rare experience. The film follows the ups-and-downs of these wild birds within the green niches of San Francisco as Bittner befriends, feeds, and names the members of the flock. Along the way, we meet many unforgettable characters: among them Connor, the grouchy yet lovable outcast of the flock, crying for a mate but luckless in his pursuits, and “the lovers,” Picasso and Sophie, inseparable until Sophie is forced into mourning when Picasso disappears. More than a mere birdwatcher, Bittner finds solace in his immersion with these strikingly beautiful creatures – but how will he cope when he’s evicted from his sanctuary and forced to live away from the parrots? Packed with romance, comedy and a surprise ending that “makes you feel like you could fly out of the theater” (San Jose Mercury News), THE WILD PARROTS OF TELEGRAPH HILL shows just how wondrously similar the human and animal worlds really can be. DVD Features: Origins of the Flock; Urban Legends; Update: Mingus at the Oasis; Parrots Music Video; Mark Bittner’s Home Movies; Flock Updates; Deleted Scenes; Theatrical Trailer; Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround; California Quail Bonus Short; Interactive Menus; Scene SelectionQuiet patience and an observant eye turn a seemingly unpromising subject into a rich and fascinating movie. The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill captures the life of Mark Bittner, a gentle homeless musician who’s befriended a flock of wild parrots in a neighborhood of San Francisco. Following Bittner, the

camera zooms in on individual parrots, revealing their individual personalities and the traits of their species. This leads to Bittner’s own life, the network of friendships that support him, and the ways in which the parrots–a non-native species–interact with both the natural ecosystem and the city government; just about every topic opens up another until a flock of colorful birds represents a microcosm of nature and society.

Filmmaker Judy Irving has created an exemplary documentary simply by paying attention to the details of the world around her subject.

Everything you expect from a Hollywood blockbuster–romance, violence, humor, sorrow, strong personalities in conflict–is here in spades, except that the heroes and heroines have bright red and green feathers. Utterly rewarding. –Bret Fetzer

Product Description:
An “engrossing, delightful film” (The Washington Post), The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill is the bonafide sleeper theatrical hit of the year. The film’s endearing guide is Mark Bittner, an aging bohemian, but the supporting cast members, a rambunctious flock of urban parrots, are the true stars, and their surprisingly humanlike behavior makes for a wondrous and rare experience. The film follows the ups-and-downs of these wild birds within the green niches of San Francisco as Bittner befriends, feeds, and names the members of the flock. Along the way, we meet many unforgettable characters: among them Connor, the grouchy yet lovable outcast of the flock, crying for a mate but luckless in his pursuits, and “the lovers,” Picasso and Sophie, inseparable until Sophie is forced into mourning when Picasso disappears. More than a mere birdwatcher, Bittner finds solace in his immersion with these strikingly beautiful creatures – but how will he cope when he’s evicted from his sanctuary and forced to live away from the parrots? Packed with romance, comedy and a surprise ending that “makes you feel like you could fly out of the theater” (San Jose Mercury News), The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill shows just how wondrously similar the human and animal worlds really can be.

Wild About Animals? See More!


The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill (book)

March of the Penguins

Grizzly Man

Winged Migration

Best Documentaries of 2005

Nature & Wildlife DVDs

Below, Cinephile Ned Viall interviews producer/director Judy Irving:

Ned: There’s a scene early on where you ask, “Why don’t you cut your hair?” Mark says, “I’m not going to cut my hair until I have a girlfriend.” So I wondered, “Will there be a scene at the end where he cuts his hair?” Did you know what was going to happen when you recorded that scene?

Judy: I recorded that close to the beginning of the project. I didn’t know how things would end up. As I was editing, I knew what I was doing, though. Like in dramatic films, I wanted to have setups and payoffs throughout the movie. That was one of them. I also wanted folks almost to forget it after it happened.

Ned: I was struck by the narrative quality of Parrots. It’s almost like a fiction film. There’s Connor, the outcast. He’s like the tough guy who turns out to have a heart of gold, sticking up for the injured birds as their fellow cherry heads attack them. Then he suffers his apparent tragic demise—like the brother in Slumdog Millionaire.

Judy: Connor was the classic outsider. I didn’t make anything up. The cherry heads didn’t like him because of his blue head. Discrimination happens even in the bird world.

Ned: Another part of the story arc was where you create this beautiful world, and then it has to end. Mark has to leave. What’s going to happen to the birds?

Judy: That all happened while I was filming. Mark was living in the cottage, and the owners had to ask him to move because it was literally sliding down the hill. I knew that might happen when I started filming. I just hoped I’d get enough shot before he had to go. So his moving became part of the story. But in a documentary you can’t control those things. There’s no script. That’s the risk you take. You just hope events will unfold in a way that makes a good story. I much prefer storyline documentaries to standard “talking heads and b-roll” type documentaries

Ned: In the movie you’re not antagonistic exactly, but you keep asking Mark questions like, how come you don’t get a job? Gradually, that changes. There’s more to him than you thought.

Judy: When I first met Mark, I wasn’t sure he was movie material, frankly. (Laughs.) After awhile I realized he was a great storyteller, with a good voice and screen presence. I needed to ask the questions that the audience would ask.

Ned: The film is not at all what most people expect it to be.

Judy: Right. And because of the title, a lot of guys aren’t interested in watching it. Then their girlfriends or wives drag them to it, and they’re moved. They find out that it’s about much more than just parrots. It’s about personality, consciousness, and life and death.

Ned: And love.

Judy: (Laughs.) And love.

Buy “The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill” For Only $10.00

Related Blogs

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
5 Comments
  • bird turd
    May 2, 2010
    #1
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I really liked the footage and observations in this film. That being said, everything else was so annoying, i wanted to hit myself in the head the entire time. Mark really needs to get a job, and Judy’s romantic agenda completely baffled me and by the end of the movie I was in hysterics. Especially after the visit to the wierdos who have a house full of “special needs” birds. Birds are remarkable. Can’t say the same for San Francisco.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • G. McGilvray
    May 2, 2010
    #2
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    While the birds are gorgeous, this is a hippie movie and not for kids. Monologue by protagonist (narrator and lover of the adorable parrots) whether he should bother getting a job or not and hints of drugs are not suitable for children. This movie is really only for adult bird lovers. One star as an adult film. Zero stars as a children’s movie.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Wes
    May 2, 2010
    #3
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    My reply to director Judy Irving: If the original framing was indeed 1.66:1 then a slight cropping would result as 4:3 televisions are in a 1.33:1 aspect ratio. While it’s impossible for me now to compare what I viewed theatrically vs. this dvd framing, I posit that the image IS zoomed in. If the original negative ratio was indeed 1.37:1 (or 1.66:1), but was projected at 1.78:1 – 1.85:1 for theatrical release then I thank her for her explanation, but this “full-frame” just doesn’t look right – it DOES look like a “pan & scan” transfer. It should have been transfered into a 1.66:1 WIDESCREEN aspect ratio – NOT left at 1.33:1

    Amazon’s own Product Details lists this dvd release as widescreen, in the 1.78:1 aspect ratio. That is FALSE, an outright ERROR – WHY IS IT STILL LABELED AS SUCH?

    Alright, I love this movie. I would happily give it 5 stars EXCEPT FOR ONE THING: THIS DVD IS NOT WIDESCREEN. Yes, it WAS filmed in the 1.78:1 aspect ratio (go to imdb.com for more technical specs), and I had absolutely no reason to believe this title wouldn’t be issued as such but somebody at Docurama screwed up – BIG TIME. I mean, come on – it was filmed throughout beautiful San Francisco. Granted, some of it was shot on 16mm, but I remember seeing this in a theater where it was projected in its proper wide format. But no, you get a godawful, CROPPED “fullscreen” framing – that’s it. There is NO EXCUSE for that. It’s an outrage. For this, I’m giving it only 1 star. Such a shame for such a beautiful film…

    By the way, the “music video” turns my stomach. WHAT an embarrassment.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Harry M. Shin
    May 2, 2010
    #4
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    1. Ok, so I bought into the hype about this movie… and I was duped (as happens once in a while).

    2. Many have already commented on the pros / cons of this film, but ultimately it is a very sad commentary on the certain percentage of those who think this film is great, on the the film maker and on the primary human subject of this film. Why? While idealism has a proper place in all of our lives, misguided romantic notions of life are destructive to one’s life as well as those close to that person as well as the greater society, simply because such notions are not realistic. And in thus in the end, such unrealistic views on life and how one should live only serves to negatively affect that individuals life. While on the other hand, those who champion and laud such folks, feel sophisticated and superior because they are “enlightened”, but do so at the expense of these misguided characters. One could interpret such things as a form of exploitation or at least disingenuousness.

    3. If the above ramblings are a bit too obtuse, the bottomline is–> depending on your philosophy of life, you may like this film or not. Those who are liberal will love it. Those who are conservative, will not like it. Those who don’t know what those terms mean… will probably like it.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Steven Hellerstedt
    May 2, 2010
    #5
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Pleasant enough documentary that lovingly profiles bohemian author Mark Bittner and the feral parrots of the Telegraph Hill area of San Francisco. There’s an awful lot of footage of Bittner feeding the birds, and, the great strength of this movie, Bittner telling anecdotes about and the personal histories of the parrots he’d befriended. This dvd includes a lot of nice extras – deleted scenes, some follow-up scenes on a couple of the parrots – most particularly Connor, who disappeared from the flock (we find out what happened to him) and a follow-up visit with Mingus, the clown, who was given to a bird shelter.

    Many people will find this one of those life-affirming films whose after glow lasts a long time. If so, more power to you. If you’re looking for something beyond a profile of a somewhat eccentric bird-lover, though, this will prove unsatisfying. For one thing, there’s little beyond some inconclusive urban legend scenes speculating on how these South American parrots made it to San Francisco in the first place. It’s not vital to the story, but these parrots were probably intended for the domestic pet market. The fact that these birds are easily domesticated played around in the back of my head while watching this movie, and seriously cut into the awe I might otherwise have felt for a movie profiling someone who befriended them. That Bittner had the time – three-plus 24/7 years – brought up another issue. Telegraph Hill isn’t the cheapest neighborhood in this country, and how Bittner was able to live there rent-free for years is a testament to the usually unsung generosity so rampant in this country today. Unfortunately, the couple who provided housing for Bittner come across a little miserly when they evict him when their home is going to undergo a major renovation. The movie doesn’t at all try to paint them that way, I hasten to add, but that’s the effect. Even though this is a loving profile, rather than another kind of documentary, there still should have been more attention given to the issue of invasive foreign species. The parrots aren’t native to San Francisco, and the movie leads us to believe their effect on the area is benign. That may well be the case, but the short scene of a city council meeting (Bittner testified at the hearing) has a councilman telling the camera some local conservationists advocated eradicating the parrots. It was an intriguing road of inquiry not taken, and the hole it left in the story was frustrating.

    I’m not a bird fancier, and I’m usually pretty immune to movies that others find inspiring. The pictures are nice, the stories Bittner relates about the parrots are moderately interesting, but that’s about all I got out of it.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Leave a Reply:




Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes