GameNow WP Theme

Dark Light
Hard Rain

The setting is the flood-ravaged, evacuated town of Huntingburg, where Tom (Slater), an armored car driver, is in deep danger. A gang of thieves (led by Freeman) figures the flood is their chance to heist the money Tom is transporting from local banks. But there’s one thing the gun-carrying criminals didn’t count on – Tom. Come hell or high water, he’s determined to deliver the money entrusted to him. But before he does, he’ll have to survive a relentless pursuit filled with close calls, floods, uncertain loyalties and heart-stopping heroics.It may not be a disaster movie, per se, but this terminally silly thriller is certainly disastrous, and would be pointless without the novelty of its setting in a flooding Midwestern town during a torrential rainfall. Physically impressive but idiotic in every other respect, the movie pits an armored truck courier (Christian Slater) against a smart leader of thieves (Morgan Freeman) and a corruptible town sheriff (Randy Quaid) who are vying for possession of $3 million in cash. A waterlogged game of cat and mouse, the plot is so contrived that even the most impressive action sequences–such as a jet-ski chase through flooded high-school corridors–are robbed of their already tenuous credibility. Before long you’ll be yawning as incompetent accomplices are systematically dispatched by their own stupidity, in the kind of movie where the use of power boats inevitably leads to at least one death by outboard motor. What’s impressive here is the physical production itself–the effect of flooding was created by building a huge replica of downtown Huntington, Indiana, in a huge, watertight aircraft hangar in Palmdale, California! –Jeff Shannon

Buy “Hard Rain “ For Only $9.89

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
5 Comments
  • M. A Oberly
    March 5, 2010
    #1
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    For those who continue to bash other reviewers for giving their opinions of movies here,please get a life. They are entitled to post reviews,just as you are.

    This is standard D grade hollywood action fare,about as contrived and stupid as it gets. The acting isn’t really an issue,here,it’s the braindead plot and script,which frequently makes no sense. The special effects aren’t really impressive,either,since much of the film looks as if it was filmed in a bathtub.

    By the way,it seems in vogue amongst Amazon browsers to excuse and apologize for any mediocre and brainless flick by stating ‘lighten up,it’s an action movie!’,or ‘it’s a comedy!’. I suppose any dreck ever vomited upon the landscape can be immune to criticism under these terms. That said,if you really,really,really,really liked ‘Con Air’,and you’re in the mood for something less weighty,this little film is for you!

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Inspector Gadget
    March 5, 2010
    #2
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Thank you Lionsgate for pointlessly region-locking this 12-year-old film on Blu Ray. I totally cannot play it now. That’s money you WON’T be making from a sale.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • hi
    March 5, 2010
    #3
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I saw this at Blockbuster for rent and saw Morgan Freeman’s name on it so I decided to rent it. I thought it was going to be a solid thriller but boy was I wrong.

    This movie is an action movie, and one really unrealistic movie. Morgan Freeman is great as usual and there is some fun. But, the movie is predictable, unrealistic, dumb and has bad acting. Christian Slater’s acting was horrible and Morgan Freeman can’t save the movie. The plot is neat, in which an armored truck transports a lot of money in a huge flood. But, some crooks hold it up to steal the money. The problem is that the officer in the truck won’t let them off so easy and tries to bring the money to where it’s supposed to go.

    I had the movie predicted 10 minutes into it and the movie had no suspense or anything. All it was, was Christian Slater beating everyone up. It had some good chases but besides that and some ok action, it was a bad movie.

    It’s not even worth renting because of its terrible acting, predictability, and basically everything about it.

    Morgan Freeman is good but this movie degrades him. This movie is mindless junk but not good mindless junk. Commando is good mindless junk but this isn’t. Forget this movie and just act like it doesn’t even exist. This movie isn’t interesting at all and I recommend never watching it.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Reviewer
    March 5, 2010
    #4
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    There’s action, water (plenty of water), gun play, more action, actors from the “A” list (Morgan Freeman, Minnie Driver), one from the “B” list (Randy Quaid) and the “star” of it all, Christian Slater; “It” being none other than “Hard Rain,” an “action/thriller” written by Graham Yost and directed by Mikael Salomon. Going in, it would seem that it has all the elements required of a film of this genre to succeed. Going out, one must pause to reflect and wonder: How did this movie ever see the light of day? How did it even get made? Better yet, why? For anyone unlucky enough to have suffered through this muddle in a theater, the only “thrill” would’ve been finally being able to leave when it was over. One of the blessings of video is that it adds to one’s options; in this case, being able to TURN IT OFF and cut your losses. The trouble begins with the screenplay by Yost (who as a writer is responsible for a number of decent, exciting movies, including “Speed, “Broken Arrow” and “Mission To Mars”), whose concept here is suspect from the start. In the middle of a flood, which quickly renders everyone practically immobile (almost immediately every character is up to their waist in water), four men planning to rob an armored car continue on as if their feet are still on dry ground; and it’s only the beginning of a plot that stretches credibility just too far. As it plods along (I should say “slogs” along), even suspending disbelief will not work here; sure, this is an action flick and you have to accept what you’re given to a certain extent. But here we’re to believe, for instance, that no less than six lifelong law-abiding, decent citizens suddenly become murderers and thieves, two with some premeditation, four at the drop of a hat. It just doesn’t wash, by anyone’s measuring stick. Soon frames of reference begin to cloud and merge, which creates an even more ambiguous reality; halfway through this movie you can’t tell the good guys from the bad guys without a scorecard. And, as if to make sure that none of this can be taken with even a grain of salt, the dialogue is so bad it must be the stuff of which an actor’s worst nightmares are born. Better they should have no lines to say than be saddled with this inane prattle. At least when the story picks up the town has already been evacuated, except for the Sheriff and three or four officers and a utility worker, and of course the obligatory (in this case three) others who refuse to leave. This is a positive note, however. Fewer characters means fewer occasions for banal utterances. The crushing blow is delivered, however, by director Salomon, whose lack of imagination renders this film D.O.A. And he should have seen it coming; it’s his job to know what works and what doesn’t. He’s the one with the placard that says “The Buck Stops Here.” The real shame of this debacle, though, is the waste of such talent as Freeman and Driver, especially, and even Quaid and Slater. They deserve better. To their credit, they all did as much as was humanly possible with the material with which they were given to work. This is one of those projects that must have looked good on paper, but somewhere in the execution went south. And apparently very quickly. The supporting cast includes Edward Asner (Uncle Charlie), Michael A. Goorjian (Kenny), Richard A. Dysart (Henry), Betty White (Doreen) and Mark Rolston (Wayne). On the positive side, “Hard Rain” does have some decent special F/X. But the best thing about this movie is the fact that it makes one appreciate a really good film, the kind we’ve come to expect from the people involved with this one. It makes you appreciate Schwarzenegger. It even makes you appreciate Van Damme. Then again, this isn’t the first time that actors of this caliber have been entangled with a movie this bad. In fact, if you listen closely you can almost hear Michael Caine off somewhere chuckling and whispering “Jaws 4″ to himself in a quiet aside.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • donny donald
    March 5, 2010
    #5
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    This movie is so bad, I didn’t even watch it all. It’s like watching a bad made-for-TV movie. There is a lot of water and that makes it interesting to look at, but the story is lame and noone acts like they are real people at all. It’s like they are reading the script as they go and even the actors must think it’s stupid, because they don’t seem like they care. As I watched, I guessed that someone in Hollywood heard about a town that would be completely flooded, so they went there and made a movie without any time to write a story. It feels like they sat around for 20 minutes, thought of something to do for the next scene and shot it with one take. Really embarrassing for such well-known actors. What were they thinking!? Skip it and be glad you did.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Leave a Reply:




Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes