GameNow WP Theme

Dark Light
Little Women

Louisa May Alcott’s famous novel of the March family, brought to the screen.This sumptuous 1949 film adaptation of the beloved Louisa May Alcott novel isn’t as good as the 1933 Katharine Hepburn version, or even the 1994 remake starring an Oscar-nominated Winona Ryder, but it does offer its own pleasures, especially in seeing an all-star cast put through its paces. Erstwhile tomboy June Allyson stars as Alcott’s famed heroine Jo, the budding writer in Civil War New England who pines for adventure, independence, and her own career. With Father off to war, it’s up to Jo, practical older sister Meg (Janet Leigh), frail sister Beth (Margaret O’Brien), and vain sister Amy (Elizabeth Taylor) to help Marmee (a saintly Mary Astor) keep the home fires warm while dealing with the rigors of adolescence. It’s all poured on with a generous amount of syrup, including lavish sets, hoop skirts, and petticoats, but anyone who’s ever read Alcott’s book will take comfort in its familiar story line. The dialogue is clunky but earnest, but you’d have to have a heart of stone not to get caught up in Jo’s plight. And rarely do you get to see such stars go at it with such gusto: Allyson and Peter Lawford (as neighbor and rich boy Laurie) are a match made in B-movie heaven, Taylor is spunky and hilarious in an early comic performance, and Leigh does the matronly thing with aplomb. And nobody, but nobody, cries and suffers like Margaret O’Brien! Watch it in the wintertime, with a fire roaring. –Mark Englehart

Buy “Little Women” For Only $7.99

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
5 Comments
  • Brian Dorton
    March 5, 2010
    #1
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    AFTER WATCHING THE 1994 VERSION STARRING WINONA RYDER, I HAD A HARD TIME WATCHING THIS ONE. THE ONLY REASON I BOTHERED IS BECAUSE THE 94 VERSION WAS SO GREAT. I THOUGHT THIS ONE MIGHT BE GOOD. SORRY BUT YOU CAN’T EVEN COMPARE’M. SO WHAT AM I DOING? BYE.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Lizzy
    March 5, 2010
    #2
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I loved the book, I loved the Hepburn version, liked the Ryder version, but this…it just bored the tar out of me! It did match the book fairly well, but it dragged on so much that I fought to stay awake through most of it! Rent it first if you must, don’t waste your money.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    March 5, 2010
    #3
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    What an insult! The makers of this movie are truly mean! They make fun of Amy and Jo, especially Amy, and are so very rude! They have turned the classic, heartwarming novel, my favorite of all time, to a hideous comedy! UGH!

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    March 5, 2010
    #4
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I love the cast. June Allyson is perfect Jo and Magaret O’brien is simply touching. But unlike the cast, the movie is not that believable. I agree with Maltin. It is too glossy! MGM art team made the March family another Rockefellers! They didn’t read the book. I’m sure.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Anonymous
    March 5, 2010
    #5
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I love the cast. June Allyson is perfect Jo and Magaret O’brien is simply touching. But unlike the cast, the movie is not that believable. I agree with Maltin. It is too grossy! MGM art team made the March family another Rockefellers! They didn’t read the book. I’m sure.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Leave a Reply:




Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes