When jewel thief, Franky Four Fingers (Benicio Del Toro), takes a slight detour to London on route to delivering a huge stolen diamond to his boss in New York, he unwittingly sets off an avalanche of sinister and comic events that wind their way through the rough and tumble worlds of bare-knuckle boxing, Irish gypsies, pawn shops, pig farming and… a stray dog. Snatch, Guy Ritchie’s brilliant follow up to his critically acclaimed Lock, Stock And Two Smoking Barrels, exposes us to his hip and helter-skelter view of London’s gangster underbelly. Ritchie’s characteristic fast-paced and constantly twisting story features a madcap ensemble cast of larger-than-life characters, including Jason Statham, an unlicensed boxing promoter; Stephen Graham, his bumbling Sidekick; Alan Ford, the local underworld kingpin; Dennis Farina, Franky’s no-nonsense boss; Vinnie Jones, a legendary thug; Rade Sherbedgia, a psycho double-crossing Russian; and Brad Pitt, in a hilarious turn as a fast-talking gypsy bare-knuckle boxer.Usually it might seem a tad unfair to begin a review by referring to the director’s missis. But then the missis in question wouldn’t usually be Madonna–a woman whose ability to reinvent herself several times before breakfast seems in marked contrast to that of hubby Guy Ritchie. Certainly, this follow-up to the filmmaker’s breakthrough film–the high-energy, expletive-strewn cockney-gangster movie Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels–hardly breaks new ground being, well, another high-energy, expletive-strewn cockney-gangster movie. OK, so there are some differences. This time around our low-rent hoodlums are battling over dodgy fights and stolen diamonds rather than dodgy card games and stolen drugs. There has been some minor reshuffling of the cast too, with Sting and Dexter Fletcher making way for the more bankable Benicio Del Toro and Brad Pitt, the latter pretty much stealing the whole shebang as an incomprehensible Irish gypsy. And, sure, people who really, really liked Lock, Stock–or have the memory of a goldfish–will really, really like this. The suspicion lingers, however, that if the director doesn’t do something very different next time around then his career may prove to be considerably shorter than that of his missis. –Clark Collis
Random Products
Tag Cloud Blogroll
-
GaoGaiGar King of Braves ̵...
Filed under: Kids
-
Black Dynamite...
Filed under: Classic
- Kolchak – The Night Stal... Filed under: Horror
-
The Best of Abbott & Cost...
Filed under: Horror
- Tenchi Muyo – OVA DVD Bo... Filed under: Kids
-
Neon Genesis Evangelion –...
Filed under: Kids
-
Star Wars: Clone Wars, Vol. 1...
Filed under: Kids
- LG 47LH90 47-Inch 1080p 240 Hz... Filed under: Televisions
-
Whisper of the Heart...
Filed under: Kids
-
Walker Texas Ranger: The Seven...
Filed under: Westerns
-
Julia & Jacques Cooking A...
Filed under: Documentary
- The Last House on the Left (Un... Filed under: Horror
-
Be My Valentine, Charlie Brown...
Filed under: Kids
- Sony VPLHS20 Cineza Digital Ho... Filed under: Projectors
- Essential Classics – Rom... Filed under: Military
720p
1080p
Anniversary
Black
Bluray
Classic
Collection
Collector's
Complete
Digital
Disc
Edition
First
From
HDMI
HDTV
Home
Live
Lumens
Movie
Panasonic
Part
Plasma
Player
Portable
Projector
Recorder
Reviews
Samsung
Season
Second
Series
Sony
Speaker
Special
Story
System
Theater
Toshiba
TwoDisc
Ultimate
Vol.
Volume
Widescreen
World


February 13, 2006
#1
When I first saw this movie, I was laughing my head off. but not because it was funny. I was laughing at how braindead it was and the fact that anybody at all likes this movie. Of course, if it’s a movie with Brad Pitt, then you know you’ll feel like walking out of the theater during the first few minutes of the film.
The plot: Basically, it’s just a bunch of idiotic crooks searching for some diamond of no importance. I couldn’t make head or tail of what was going on, since the plot alternated between searching for the diamond and car chases. The acting was atrocious, especially Brad Pitt’s performance, if you can call it that. His irish accent was so thick and he was talking so fast I couldn’t figure out what the hell he was trying to say.
In conclusion, if you are one of those typical moviegoers who doesn’t care about story, dialogue, acting and all the other things that make a movie great and you love stories with no point, then you will love this film. if you are a serious film lover like me, then I suggest you search somewhere else for entertainment and enlightenment.
Skip this movie. IT IS NOT WORTH YOUR TIME. DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY ON IT!!!
February 13, 2006
#2
One of the worst movies I have ever seen, period.
The plot: oh wait, there wasn’t one.
The theme: let’s make an even crappier version of Ocean’s Eleven, use almost the same cast, make it even more boring and pointless, and throw in some black guys with British accents.
The characters: wise-ass Brits that try, but really really fail at being funny (this it the kind of movie that morons say is “hilarious,” but trust me, whenever something is “hilarious,” it’s not funny at all
The style: a bunch of really crappy cuts that are supposed to make you feel like the movie was cutting edge or some crap
The music: not bad, wasn’t an abortion like the rest of the movie
The ending: the bringing together of a bunch of trivial crap that no one cares about. It’s supposed to make you go, “Ohhhhh, wow!” but it made me go, “Oh…okay…so?”
The verdict: seriously consider suicide as a better option than this movie…it’s about as exciting as a ten minute crap
February 13, 2006
#3
I had (notice the past tense) a girlfriend who loved this movie and brought it over one night for us to watch. The way she described it made me really want to see it. Unfortunately, her sales skills far surpassed anything the movie had to offer. I was under the impression that this was a comedy – and I really enjoy comedies – but the comedic moments were few and very far between.
Part of the fault for the sad overall outcome of this movie must lie with the editor. The movie could have flowed far better, been easier to follow, and been funnier with proper editing.
February 13, 2006
#4
I heard from my friends this movie was amazing, great, fantabulous. But when I rented this movie and brought it to my house, I was just disappointed. There was swearing every three seconds and tons of senseless violence.
The swearing kept on coming, and the act grew old. And you know what? I think they used the word “F*CK” more than they did in Blare Witch. It was an absolutely crapped up movie, and I wouldn’t watch it again unless someone put a gun to my head. I hate this movie.
February 13, 2006
#5
this movie just makes me angry i dont know how the talentless director Guy Ritchie would make an action film with out any blood or gore. this has less sexual tension then monsters inc. and toy story combined. this movie was a serious disapointing to an evil,sick and sadistical gore hound like myself. if you wont to see a better film watch irreversible,i spit on your grave or salo and the 120 days of sodom.