GameNow WP Theme

Dark Light
Blade Runner

A blend of science fiction and noir detective fiction Blade Runner (1982) was a box office and critical bust upon its initial exhibition but its unique postmodern production design became hugely influential within the sci-fi genre and the film gaWhen Ridley Scott’s cut of Blade Runner was finally released in 1993, one had to wonder why the studio hadn’t done it right the first time–11 years earlier. This version is so much better, mostly because of what’s been eliminated (the ludicrous and redundant voice-over narration and the phony happy ending) rather than what’s been added (a bit more character development and a brief unicorn dream). Star Harrison Ford originally recorded the narration under duress at the insistence of Warner Bros. executives who thought the story needed further “explanation”; he later confessed that he thought if he did it badly they wouldn’t use it. (Moral: Never overestimate the taste of movie executives.) The movie’s spectacular futuristic vision of Los Angeles–a perpetually dark and rainy metropolis that’s the nightmare antithesis of “Sunny Southern California”–is still its most seductive feature, an otherworldly atmosphere in which you can immerse yourself. The movie’s shadowy visual style, along with its classic private-detective/murder-mystery plot line (with Ford on the trail of a murderous android, or “replicant”), makes Blade Runner one of the few science fiction pictures to legitimately claim a place in the film noir tradition. And, as in the best noir, the sleuth discovers a whole lot more (about himself and the people he encounters) than he anticipates…. With Sean Young, Edward James Olmos, Daryl Hannah, Rutger Hauer, and M. Emmet Walsh. –Jim EmersonWhen Ridley Scott’s cut of Blade Runner was finally released in 1993, one had to wonder why the studio hadn’t done it right the first time–11 years earlier. This version is so much better, mostly because of what’s been eliminated (the ludicrous and redundant voice-over narration and the phony happy ending) rather than what’s been added (a bit more character development and a brief unicorn dream). Star Harrison Ford originally recorded the narration under duress at the insistence of Warner Bros. executives who thought the story needed further “explanation”; he later confessed that he thought if he did it badly they wouldn’t use it. (Moral: Never overestimate the taste of movie executives.) The movie’s spectacular futuristic vision of Los Angeles–a perpetually dark and rainy metropolis that’s the nightmare antithesis of “Sunny Southern California”–is still its most seductive feature, an otherworldly atmosphere in which you can immerse yourself. The movie’s shadowy visual style, along with its classic private-detective/murder-mystery plot line (with Ford on the trail of a murderous android, or “replicant”), makes Blade Runner one of the few science fiction pictures to legitimately claim a place in the film noir tradition. And, as in the best noir, the sleuth discovers a whole lot more (about himself and the people he encounters) than he anticipates…. With Sean Young, Edward James Olmos, Daryl Hannah, Rutger Hauer, and M. Emmet Walsh. –Jim Emerson

Buy “Blade Runner “ For Only $2.12

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
5 Comments
  • Dale Newcomb Jr.
    March 5, 2010
    #1
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I don’t get what all the fuss was about, this movie really wasn’t worth the time spent on it – even in Director’s Cut format. As a fan of Cyberpunk novels (Neuromancer, Snow Crash, etc.), I have been told many times that I should see this movie. Now I have, and I must say I wish that I hadn’t. Movies like Strange Days, The Matrix, or even 5th Element are much better.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Tyler Reece
    March 5, 2010
    #2
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Harrison Ford becomes a screen legend off of Han Solo and Indiana Jones and then he does this futuristic toilet of a movie. The story didn’t make any sense and it was just a bad movie, you shouldn’t combine film noir with sc-fi, no Maltese Falcon with the Jetsons, or it just didn’t work with this movie. Ridley Scott directs great films like Gladiator and Alien,then directs this wasteland of a flick that shouldn’t be apart of the future with or without flying cars. any one who think this is better than Star Wars than get the hell off Amazon. Hollywood Homocide might treat you to better Harrison Ford films. If you want good futuristic movies rent Minority Report or I, Robot. Make a better future by getting rid of “BAD RUNNER” Harrison, don’t think less of you because this crap you did.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Strobe Lights And Blown Speakers
    March 5, 2010
    #3
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I find this film unbearable. The acting is very sub-par. Harrison Ford isn’t good . The dialogue is forced and trite. The character development is non-existent. At no point in the film did I care what was going on. I wanted a giant asteroid to obliterate everyone so the film would end. Also…why, oh WHY, is Rutger Hauer running around in his boxers and slamming his head through walls?! It doesn’t make sense, nor is it even slightly entertaining.

    I have never been so angry after watching a film. It put me in a bad mood for the rest of the day. _Blade Runner_ is probably the least entertaining film ever made. I would rather have an anvil dropped on me than be subjected to this film again. Avoid this film (as well as another horrible “classic,” _Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Bomb_) at all costs.

    (sidenote: the special effects are quite good)

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Karl
    March 5, 2010
    #4
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    This has to be the worst movie I ever watched… or sorry, I should say worst movie I’ve ever attempted to watch. I don’t understand how people love this movie. It’s boring and stupid. Also the acting is terrible. Harrison Ford at his worst!!!

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • hockhamb@hotmail.com
    March 5, 2010
    #5
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

    I’m not getting into the argument about which version is better. It seems there’s a lot of emotion flying about but suffice to say that each to his own, and as long as you enjoy it.

    I think this movie is based on a novel by Stanley Kubrick (I think??? Correct me if wrong!) called ‘Do androids dream electric dreams’ (another book I’ve never got round to reading).

    In terms of casting, this film about did it perfect. Harrison Ford was, naturally, the choice for the cop, with Rutger Hauer providing the performance of his life. Each of the other androids are played beautifully, especially Darryl Hannah’s unusually cast role as a sex droid, capable of breaking a mans head between her thighs.

    The music is almost definately a classic – it drifts along catching the ear, slightly permeating the feel of the city, it’s rough streets awash with grime.

    There are several classic scenes in this movie; the snake womans (painful) demise (who’d of thought death could appear so disgusting and beautiful, yet its a robot…), ‘Time to Die’, the final moments for Ford and his new lover.

    I think you’ll be hard pushed to find anything close to this in it’s genre, and for me personally it rates in my top ten favourites (somewhere). Buy it, watch it, love it.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Leave a Reply:




Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes