In THE UNTOUCHABLES, federal agent Elliot Ness leads a group of mob fighters with the intent of taking out the infamous Al Capone in 1930′s Prohibition-era Chicago. Realizing that practical methods will not work in securing Capone’s capture, Ness and his men resort to using even more force in order to take down the Chicago mob boss once and for all.As noted critic Pauline Kael wrote, the 1987 box-office hit The Untouchables is “like an attempt to visualize the public’s collective dream of Chicago gangsters.” In other words, this lavish reworking of the vintage TV series is a rousing potboiler from a bygone era, so beautifully designed and photographed–and so craftily directed by Brian De Palma–that the historical reality of Prohibition-era Chicago could only pale in comparison. From a script by David Mamet, the movie pits four underdog heroes (the maverick lawmen known as the Untouchables) against a singular villain in Al Capone, played by Robert De Niro as a dapper caesar holding court (and a baseball bat) against any and all challengers. Kevin Costner is the naive federal agent Eliot Ness, whose lack of experience is tempered by the streetwise alliance of a seasoned Chicago cop (Sean Connery, in an Oscar-winning performance), a rookie marksman (Andy Garcia), and an accountant (Charles Martin Smith) who holds the key to Capone’s potential downfall. The movie approaches greatness on the strength of its set pieces, such as the siege near the Canadian border, the venal ambush at Connery’s apartment, and the train-station shootout partially modeled after the “Odessa steps” sequences of the Russian classic Battleship Potemkin. It’s thrilling stuff, fueled by Ennio Morricone’s dynamic score, but it’s also manipulative and obvious. If you’re inclined to be critical, the movie gives you reason to complain. If you’d rather sit back and enjoy a first-rate production with an all-star cast, The Untouchables may very well strike you as a classic. –Jeff ShannonAs noted critic Pauline Kael wrote, the 1987 box-office hit The Untouchables is “like an attempt to visualize the public’s collective dream of Chicago gangsters.” In other words, this lavish reworking of the vintage TV series is a rousing potboiler from a bygone era, so beautifully designed and photographed–and so craftily directed by Brian De Palma–that the historical reality of Prohibition-era Chicago could only pale in comparison. From a script by David Mamet, the movie pits four underdog heroes (the maverick lawmen known as the Untouchables) against a singular villain in Al Capone, played by Robert De Niro as a dapper caesar holding court (and a baseball bat) against any and all challengers. Kevin Costner is the naive federal agent Eliot Ness, whose lack of experience is tempered by the streetwise alliance of a seasoned Chicago cop (Sean Connery, in an Oscar-winning performance), a rookie marksman (Andy Garcia), and an accountant (Charles Martin Smith) who holds the key to Capone’s potential downfall. The movie approaches greatness on the strength of its set pieces, such as the siege near the Canadian border, the venal ambush at Connery’s apartment, and the train-station shootout partially modeled after the “Odessa steps” sequences of the Russian classic Battleship Potemkin. It’s thrilling stuff, fueled by Ennio Morricone’s dynamic score, but it’s also manipulative and obvious. If you’re inclined to be critical, the movie gives you reason to complain. If you’d rather sit back and enjoy a first-rate production with an all-star cast, The Untouchables may very well strike you as a classic. –Jeff Shannon
Random Products
Tag Cloud Blogroll
- Up (Single Disc Widescreen)... Filed under: Kids
-
Downhill Racer...
Filed under: Sport
-
Tommy Boy...
Filed under: Music Video
-
Will & Grace – Seas...
Filed under: Gay & Lesbian
- Different From the Others... Filed under: Uncategorized
- Monty Python: Almost The Truth... Filed under: Documentary
- The Mystery Science Theater 30... Filed under: Sport
-
The Best of G-Force...
Filed under: Kids
-
The L Word – The Complet...
Filed under: Gay & Lesbian
- Sanyo PLC XP100L – LCD p... Filed under: Projectors
- Resident Evil – Extincti... Filed under: ScienceFi
-
True Blood: The Complete Secon...
Filed under: Horror
- Wonders of the Solar System [B... Filed under: TV
-
The Wolf Man...
Filed under: Horror
- The Mothers-in-Law: The Comple... Filed under: Comedy
720p
1080p
Anniversary
Black
Bluray
Classic
Collection
Collector's
Complete
Digital
Disc
Edition
First
From
HDMI
HDTV
Home
Live
Lumens
Movie
Panasonic
Part
Plasma
Player
Portable
Projector
Recorder
Reviews
Samsung
Season
Second
Series
Sony
Speaker
Special
Story
System
Theater
Toshiba
TwoDisc
Ultimate
Vol.
Volume
Widescreen
World


April 5, 2008
#1
This is one of the worst films I have ever seen. What good is extravagant set design when you have hack directing, hackneyed writing/storytelling, and poor editing? Virtually every scene is leaden, overly-long, and devoid of suspense or drama. Here’s just one example: The baby carriage scene (the Battleship Potemkin “homage”) is drawn out far too long to add anything to the plot. (And why bother cutting to the clock if you don’t show the minute hand move?) I could list a dozen more examples, but the film doesn’t deserve another minute of my time. An unbelievably bad stinker.
April 5, 2008
#2
Wack movie! A pure waste of money. My brother told me it sucked and he didn’t even finish watching it, that’s how bad it was, and neither did I! (SO don’t buy!)The movie was just way too old-fashioned and foolish, and the music was corny, kiddy, happy-go-lucky music that belonged is some cartoon shows that my little sister watches. A more serious type of music would have been better suited for the material of the movie since it consisted of murder, mayhem, and violence. Even the acting was corny and just plain lame-what were these four suppose to be?! The fearless foursome?! The dynamic duo or something?! Trust me, this is garbage. The only real reason people even would pay any attention to it is because it involves the mob, which is something everyone swears to heaven would make a good, five-star film. Really silly film, indeed. Topnamed actors like Coster, DeNiro, and Connery don’t mean anything if the movie is foolishness.
April 5, 2008
#3
among all the five star reviews, it’s funny nobody mentioned the blatant
misrepresentation of frank nitti in this movie.
he was not a rat-faced psychopath who was thrown off a building by elliot ness as portrayed in this movie. mr. nitti was second in command, and after capone was incarcerated, nitti ran the mob for 13 years.
his life ended when he allegedly committed suicide in 1943.
i don’t mind movies blurring the facts in the name of dramatic license,
but in this case being completely blind to actual events will earn this film only one star from me.
btw, de palma also ruined “the black dahlia.”
please mr. de palma, don’t make anymore movies.
April 5, 2008
#4
supposed saga regarding the “gansters” in old Chicago. It looked to me as if the criminals and the “good guys” were just about the same. For the corruption in the police force and the most pure “Eliot Ness” looked like it ran about neck and neck with the supposed “gangsters”. Of course the added racial slurs thrown in by the most high Sean Connery another overrated “actor”. Just terrible, don’t bother with this one.
April 5, 2008
#5
I never understood the whole homophobia thing, but I guess you get it with this movie. Okay Okay peoples, maybe perhaps it really is about some guys who are invincible but that movie already came out and that bartender that played for the Eagles, well that is a football team and they touch a lot. In fact that game, they dive and give flying bear hugs to each other. Kevin Costner is here and you know, he tried making it some emo-sap ridden baseball movie but the guys with the machine guns were not having it!
When MC Hammer jumped on stage and said “can’t touch this” I just turned it off. I said to my friend “friend, why did you rent this, next time I am going with you to the store” and that was the end of our movie night